There Is No Distinction Between suffered meat and non-suffered meat

Meaning, if it didn’t suffer it’s not meat, thus not an animal, thus animal-free.

Suffering or the lack of suffering cannot enter into the labeling of a products content.

It can’t.

It doesn’t define a product.

Suffered meat?

Non-suffered meat?

If it’s an animal and it’s now meat, it suffered.

Nobody can deny that.

Suffering is not a physical ingredient. Suffering is a state of being. It is not a piece of flesh.

These animals suffered less, so we’re going to eat the others who suffered more.

That’s a trick we play on our own minds, that allows us to continue inflicting pain and suffering upon those animals we deem inferior. It eases our otherwise guilty conscience.

The more people who go along with us, the less responsibility we accept for our actions.

Get new posts delivered directly to your inbox

Join 7 other followers

Published by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight, artist, writer, chef

Chef Davies-Tight™. The Animal-Free Chef™. ANIMAL-FREE SOUS-CHEF™. FAT-FREE CHEF™. Word Warrior Davies-Tight™. HAPPY WHITE HORSE™. SHARON ON THE NEWS™. BIRTH OF A SEED™. Till now and forever © Sharon Lee Davies-Tight, Artist, Author, Animal-Free Chef, Activist. ARCHITECT of 5 PRINCIPLES TO A BETTER LIFE™ & MAINSTREAM ANIMAL-FREE CUISINE™.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create your website with
Get started
%d bloggers like this: